The Death of Feminism

Let's talk about the future. Feminism is going to die in the next 40 years. By 2050, equal rights, legal protection, and social equality for women will have been enshrined in Irish law and, more importantly, in the Zeitgeist, for three generations or more.

In 2009, we are now as far away from 1970 as we are from the year 2050. Think about the changes in material conditions, in workplace treatment, in opportunities (and in threats) women have seen over those 40 years. Now think about how much further women have to go to reach the goal feminist thinkers and practitioners have set their movement--and the answer is 'not far'.

Yes, there are still many mountains to climb, especially on treatment of women in the home, on society's attitudes to rape, divorce, and on some aspects of labour law enforcement. The end--equal rights and legal protection--seems a long way off. Progress by the feminist movement has been steady over the last 40 years, and in fact has gathered momentum. And 40 years is a long time to climb those mountains. So it seems reasonable to ask what will replace feminism when its key battles have been won, and when those women empowered by the movement over the 40 years to 2050 take their places in the highest echelons of Irish society come to make the decisions for the nation and ask: what comes next?

Since 1970, as women’s participation and relative importance in the workforce have increased, in particular, reaching close to the same levels of income, position, and status, as men, a tectonic shift has taken place in attitudes to domestic work. There’s nothing new here, we have been aware of this change in Irish society for many years. The Celtic Tiger years brought increased labour market participation by women to new heights--and the current downturn is not affecting participation rates as badly as you might think. Women who work are here to stay, and today, most women in their twenties, when asked, do expect to work and provide for themselves.

This changing of the traditional roles between the sexes over the next 40 years could lead to a reappraisal of the role of men in the upbringing of children, changing the norm that the woman usually receives custody of the child in a divorce case as men assert their rights in the rearing of children.

Michael Kimmel, author of The Gendered Society claims that school-aged children who do housework with their fathers are more likely to get along with their peers, and have more friends. Looking forward to 2050, it’s easy to imagine a Father’s day gift being something simple, like breakfast in bed, and all Dad’s chores done for him for the day. He might also like some chocolates. The average father in the US now spends about three hours interacting with his school-aged children per weekend day, up significantly from estimates in earlier decades. At the same time, a father’s interactions with their children remain shaped by older expectations about what men and women should do, so as the modern men proliferate, older versions of what it means to be 'manly' might simply die out. Androgyny will be the rule, alpha males the exception.

Marriage in Ireland, once the key to social status, security, and children, is today more focused on the status-giving aspects than the religious or childrearing functions the institution was traditionally associated with. Women simply don’t need marriage for those reasons anymore. Childrearing has changed too: within a generation, the average number of children per woman has declined by 1.3 (from 3.5 to 2.2), and though we have just experienced a population (and a marriage) boom over the last two years as the graph shows, the long term trend in births per woman is in fact downward. The component of the graph swinging upward (in red) is the number of births registered outside marriage.

Figure 1: Births within and without marriage, 1960-2008. Source: www.cso.ie

Many of the biggest changes in the next century, at least in the developed world, will be driven by the demographic tilt away from children and towards the elderly. A snapshot of a family gathering in 2050 will show lots of gray hair, and not too many nappies. Even now, for the first time in history, the average German, the average American and the average Japanese has more parents living than children. In an impoverished Ireland, the family will take centre stage again in the provision of eldercare, especially among the poor, with state and private supports spread throughout the community.

Remember, 40 years is a pretty long time — almost anything can happen. A long term economic decline in Ireland, coupled with an explosion in health care needs by a cohort of older citizens could force more people to depend on families instead of the state, in fact returning us partially to the situation which prevailed in the 1950s and before. A religious revival could restore traditional mores, returning the Catholic Church to its preeminent position in Irish cultural life. A revised calculation of rational interest in light of social chaos could call the benefits of extreme individualism into question, and perhaps roll back some of the gains won by the feminist movement, giving the movement a reason to live again.

Comments  

 
# Pete Stillman 2009-10-20 21:49 I think the increase in births outside marriage is not an indication of social progress but rather an indication of the reduction in social cohesion. The boom of the last 10 years has accelerated trends in the breakdown of social bonds leading to an increase the number of short term relationships and the nuclear family becomes less and less common. However, some people are now choosing long term relationships that don't include marriage because that freedom of choice now exists which is a good thing.

I think the weakening of social bonds will also lead to the institutionalising of care at an increasing rate. This will mean that in poorer times, older parents will not be cared for by their children but rather be forced into state care or to fend for themselves. That trend is already evident elsewhere and Ireland is following the trend.2v
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Stephen Kinsella 2009-10-20 22:45 Hi Pete,
Thanks for the comment—social coherence is something I'm really interested, especially from the point of view of a family structure going forward. Do you see that impacting on, say, education, as well as more traditional caring roles?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Pete Stillman 2009-10-20 23:34 In the first instance I was probably referring to a weakening of social bonds within the trsditional family.

In an educational sense, our low education standards are helping to increase societal breakdown including respect for institutions, civic co-operation and the rule of law. This could be reversed somewhat by an increased investment on particularly primary education. In the last 10 yrs, we've seen an increase in teacher salaries substitute for education investment. Accelerated implementation of the new curriculum and a long term commitment to small class sizes could have been achieved by moderating pay awards in the short term and protected in the long term with teaching budgets under less pressure. I think the trend in the next 5 yrs will be to maintain teacher salary levels at the expense of investment in infrastructure and curriculum progress.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Ben Conroy 2009-10-21 12:50 @Pete,

Good point about pay. A great idea for education spending was in the original Green position paper during the renewed Programme for Government negotiations (don't think it made it entirely into the final programme though). The idea was that education spending would be untouched, with the exception of teachers' pay. It would have been a good way of seeing if the ASTI and INTO were serious about 'protecting the children' rather than themselves. Not sure about the new curriculum though. I think we need an even newer one. I'm completely with Stephen in wanting to burn down the Leaving Cert!

@Stephen,

I hope you're right about this. My Dad stays at home full-time (as well as home-educating me and my siblings), and he does a fantastic job. Where modern feminism can sometimes fall down is where it assumes that being in the workforce is intrinsically better than staying at home full-time.

Ironically for a movement that sought to end the dominance of the average white male, it sometimes acts as though the role once played by the average white male is the ideal!

Not that I'm knocking families where both parents work, but it is often forgotten that staying at home is just as valid a "choice" as any other, wouldn't you say?

One more thing before I cease my long-winded spiel. When you say that in the main "androgyny will be the rule", don't you think that there are some characteristics that are essentially 'male' (though perhaps not the macho ones currently valued by all too much of our society), and that won't change with the culture?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Stephen Kinsella 2009-10-21 14:04 @ Ben,

That's brilliant—your dad is well ahead of the curve! The point here, I think, is unrestricted choice (and reduced stigmatisation of certain choices). The trend toward androgyny doesn't mean some things won't stay exclusively male, in fact some things previously seen as female may 'pass over' to the male category, but it does mean that standards and conventions will shift, on beauty, for example, and on what a 'good' father might be expected to do—like yours!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Stephen Kinsella 2009-10-21 14:07 @ Pete,

". In the last 10 yrs, we've seen an increase in teacher salaries substitute for education investment. Accelerated implementation of the new curriculum and a long term commitment to small class sizes could have been achieved by moderating pay awards in the short term and protected in the long term with teaching budgets under less pressure"

I completely agree, but we'll have to hold off on large scale infrastructural programs for at least the next 3-4 years, after which interesting educational initiatives can be rolled out again, perhaps like this one: http://bit.ly/Voeac
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Pete Stillman 2009-10-21 23:58 I'm not sure there's a massive deficit in access to computers - I think about 70% of households have a PC of some kind. I think children would benefit far more from better access to broadband and services on top of that.

I think most importantly in education, we must change the way our children learn with more self-directed learning, the abandonding of single age classes at primary level, much more creativity at second level - with a move away from the awful leaving cert and more towards the style of the International Baccalaureate.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Ben Conroy 2009-10-22 16:39 @Stephen,

Heh, thanks, my Dad'll be flattered. The laptop scheme sounds really interesting, and I'm not sure Pete, that having computers at home is equivalent to using them as a part of learning in the classroom. A scenario where students did a lot of their 'written' work on laptops would reflect reality much better, I think. But Broadband etc. is hugely important too.

As for your education ideas Pete, I, to quote Boris Johnson, couldn't possibly disagree less.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Ben Conroy 2009-10-22 20:44 And by the way, this website is one of the few Irish places online where real discussion of ideas is taking place. Much political-economic discussion just consists of abusing those who disagree with you and throwing around phrases like "Gombeen Government." So thanks Stephen! Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Stephen Kinsella 2009-10-22 22:10 @ Ben & Pete,

Cheers for the kind words—I love this site!

I think the most important aspect of the OLPC programme is giving each child their own computer , and changing the education system to use this new hardware properly, especially with self-directed learning and coming up with new ideas!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Stephen Kinsella Blog


padraig_indo_420725s.jpg
Ireland’s recent flooding is only a taste of things to come. Few towns in Ireland even have a flood defence scheme, much less a system of levees. One challenge facing Ireland by the year 2050 is the persistent risk of rainfall. Increased rainfall brings with it an increased risk of floods, as Read more text
04_vacation1-june31.jpg
In the long run, Ireland faces two apparently unrelated challenges. First, our infrastructural deficit will grow due to repeated government cutbacks. Secondly, as our population ages, our society will struggle to pay for pensions of a greyer society. The two problems of pensions provision, and Read more text
2914772164_34314bd052_m.jpg
Image by PienJoris via Flickr Just published in Verbal Magazine Ireland has a reputation as a land where artists can thrive. Often, Ireland don’t deserve that reputation. I believe it makes long term economic, social, and cultural sense to ensure we keep funding the arts in Ireland for two Read more text
Here's my interview on TV3 last week, explaining a little about the Read more text
births.png
Let's talk about the future. Feminism is going to die in the next 40 years. By 2050, equal rights, legal protection, and social equality for women will have been enshrined in Irish law and, more importantly, in the Zeitgeist, for three generations or more. In 2009, we are now as far away from Read more text
co2data.png
Take a look at the data below, which comes from this recently released CO2 emissions report by the CSO. (You can get the data I used to make the chart here). I've taken the largest emitters of CO2 by sector, and graphed them. The data pull out an interesting story. We see a mitigation of the Read more text

stephen_kinsella

Stephen Kinsella, PhD , is a lecturer in Economics at the University of Limerick. Originally from Dublin, and in his early thirties, he has lived and studied in the US before taking up his position in the Kemmy Business School. His book Ireland in 2050 began as a newspaper opinion piece in the summer of 2008, which sparked a huge response.